Neil Taylor deal hits legal dispute. Gibson alleged Toon target.
Posted on June 27th, 2011 | 64 Comments |
Newcastle’s signing of Neil Taylor from Swansea appeared to be virtually done a week ago. The fat lady had not only sung but she’d retired, had three children and was now working in a kebab shop.
It seems that solicitors have braved daylight to get involved now though, which is rarely a good sign.
The dispute – as far as I understand it – is about the £1m clause in Taylor’s contract. Newcastle seem to think that this is a pukka release clause, allowing us to get the player if we bid that amount, whereas Swansea seem to think that the £1m bid simply gives us the right to talk to the player.
I find it odd that such a thing can be ‘in dispute’ as I would have thought that even solicitors can render such a clause in a format that humans can understand. Surely the difference is between ‘talk to’ and ‘buy’, linguistically. Pretty basic really. I would be fairly upset if I went down to my local shop and paid for a loaf of bread only to find that my payment has simply given me the right to have a conversation with said loaf.
Everton allegedly tried to hijack our bid for Neil Taylor anyway but apparently we brushed them aside in the end. Then it was thought that various holidays taken by those involved in the deal were causing the hold-up. Now it’s apparently this legal wrangling.
So, who knows how that will turn out.
Another rumour that appeared over the weekend is our alleged interest in Man Utd’s Darron Gibson who – supposedly – the Mackems have all but signed anyway. The story is that Pardew is eyeing him up as a potential second choice if our bid to get Sissoko fails, although I think there’s a fair gap between the two players in terms of experience.
I don’t think there’s a lot of mileage in the Gibson rumour to be honest, although you never can tell with these things.
Hope you all had a good weekend.
PUKKA release clause – indianism
Are swansea out of their freaking mind