Could a ‘Proxy War’ Stop Saudi Takeover of Newcastle United?
Posted on April 23rd, 2020 | 30 Comments |
The House of Saud comes with a lot of baggage and with the prospective Saudi backed takeover of Newcastle United, there has even been a report of St James’ Park being the latest battlefield in a ‘proxy war’ between Qatar and the Saudis in the New York Times. In this case they are referring to Qatari Sports broadcasting giant, beIN Sports, whose claims are on the basis of piracy regarding live coverage of games. To add to this, two other antagonists have also entered the battlefield, human rights group Amnesty International and the Scottish National Party.
Going in reverse order, SNP MP John Nicolson raised the issue with culture secretary, Oliver Dowden, during a meeting of the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport committee, where he raised the issue of Saudi Arabia’s frankly abysmal human rights record, though Dowden swiftly passed the buck on to The Premier League, saying that it was a matter for them and not Downing Street.
Moving on to Amnesty International, unsurprisingly, their objection to the takeover is also centred around the human rights record of the Saudi regime. Amnesty UK’s director, Kate Allen, wrote to Premier League chief executive, Richard Masters, warning that the credibility of the Premier League will be threatened if he gives the green light to the sale. In a message to Newcastle United and its fans she said:
“Whether or not this deal goes ahead, we’re calling on Newcastle United staff and fans to familiarise themselves with the dire human rights situation in Saudi Arabia and be prepared to speak out about it.”
On Wednesday afternoon the Premier League chief executive Richard Masters responded:
“You will appreciate that these matters are often subject to media speculation but at their heart are due processes, required by UK law and by the Premier League’s own rules, which cannot be conducted in public and on which we cannot comment.”
Going by precendence though, money has usually trumped morality in previous decisions on who are ‘fit and proper’ owners for Premier League clubs, but allowing the entry of Saudi investment money into the Premier League would take their amorality to a whole new level.
Perhaps the biggest threat comes from beIN Sports though, and their contention that Saudi state-owned satellite provider, Arabsat, have been pirating top level games (including the Premier League) on their patch. Whilst the Premier League have turned a blind eye to human rights issues in the past, they certainly have not turned a blind eye to the illegal broadcast of Premier League games and in financial terms, beIN Sports are their second biggest international broadcast partner, which makes things very awkward. Indeed, in the past, the Premier League themselves have unsuccessfully tried to take legal action against Arabsat in Saudi Arabia and in this they may see a chance for revenge, or perhaps to use this leverage to extract a substantial financial settlement in return for permission?
Looking in more detail at the piracy allegations, the operation, known as ‘beoutQ’ has been the largest in sports history, spreading beyond football with most of the events being licensed to beIN in the Middle East, which is currently the world’s largest investor in sports broadcasting rights.
In context, this is part of a wider war between the two extremely wealthy Arab nations which started when Saudi Arabia led a regional boycott of Qatar, whom the Saudis accused of supporting terrorism and being too friendly with Iran, though coming from the Saudis, the supporting terrorism allegation is a bit like being accused of being a drunk by George Best and Boris Yeltsin.
In conclusion, whilst the SNP’s objection has already been pooh-poohed and the Amnesty threat doesn’t seem to be too strong either, beIN Sport’s claim may prove to be far more dangerous.
Premier League sold it’s soul a long time ago.. Football nowadays is all about the money.. As a fan it would be nice if it wasn’t, but the powers that be have made it that way .. my point being that you can’t now put the onus on the fans to protest against political issues .. All we want as football fans is what’s best for our club in producing “football”..Why now should NUFC be the fall guy …