Nolan unhappy with top 7 finish clause in offered contract?
Posted on June 12th, 2011 | 76 Comments |
The Mirror is attempting to shed some light on Kevin Nolan’s contract situation, although whether that’s the light of truth or some light of their own invention is open to interpretation as no official sources are quoted at all.
Allegedly the contract Nolan was offered was not due to be activated until the end of next season and would only be viable if Newcastle secure a top seven finish. The contract apparently included a bonus and a £10k/week rise although that, like the contract itself, would only be activated if the team finish in the top seven.
But Nolan didn’t fancy the look of that sort of contract and rejected it.
I can’t say I blame Nolan to be honest. Unless every player’s contract is dependent on a top seven finish it hardly seems fair to single Nolan out as he can’t get the club into the top seven on his own.
Big Sam’s offer to bring Nolan to West Ham was originally reported to be £3m but it’s now being reported to have been just £1.5m, which I think is a huge insult to Nolan. Although David Sullivan – West Ham’s co-owner – was allegedly going to subsidise Nolan’s wages himself, taking him from his current £42k/week to £55k/week on a four year contract.
Apparently the club have placed a value of £4m on Nolan, which would seem to be beyond West Ham’s means but has attracted potential interest from QPR, Fulham, Stoke and West Brom.
It seems that Nolan has no desire to leave Newcastle though, but the insecurity of the contract offered might force him to do so.
I think losing him would be a huge hit on team morale and the respect his fellow players have for him is evident in their various comments.
Whether Kevin Nolan is a Newcastle player or not next season remains to be seen.
I would not sign a contract with that clause either. What has his personal contract have to do with TEAM performance. He would fell like he was carrying the whole team on his back, his performance is bound to suffer.