Are Newcastle back in for Andy O’Brien?
Posted on June 25th, 2010 | 62 Comments |
But there was also another revelation yesterday, and that was the fact the we have apparently enquired about ‘several’ Bolton players, with Andy O’Brien ‘thought’ to be one of the other players that had been enquired about as Hughton goes about trying to add to the squad before the Premier League season kicks off in August.
I said yesterday that I can see the logic in signing JLoyd Samuel. Granted he would only be a backup should anything happen to Jose Enrique, but it is still a backup player that we need. However, as far as this idea about re-signing old boy Andy O’Brien is concerned, I am struggling to come to terms with the logic for it and can’t for the life of me see why on earth we would need to sign him, especially when we have the likes of Tamas Kadar looking to make the step up to the first team in the near future.
I must stress that the only confirmed interest from us has been regarding Samuel, and that the Andy O’Brien rumour is probably just a rehash of a rumour that was floating around back in January, so nothing is confirmed at all and there is no need to spit the dummy and get all radged up over some speculation, yet.
But if there was a grain of truth in the move for O’Brien, then it leaves me more than confused as to why, just why would we need him? We already have three first-team central defenders in the form of Coloccini, Williamson and Steven Taylor, and you can add young Tamas Kadar to that list aswell which would make four central defenders, a number that is widely recognised as being adequate in terms of the squad number needed for rigours of the domestic season.
Kadar will be needing to make the step up soon, and he is more than an adequate backup player who can be called upon when needed. I can’t see the point in paying wages for a 30-year old Andy O’Brien when we already have enough cover anyway, and is it really up Mike Ashley’s street to spend more than what is necessary on Newcastle? Hadaway man….
Then you have to look at the places that this rumour is coming from, particularly from internet sites which shall remain nameless, and lets just say they are not known for their accurate accounts of things. The Journal, to their credit, only “thinks” that the other player enquired about “could” be Andy O’Brien, although who knows just what that is based on eh?
At the end of the day, the JLoyd Samuel rumour is the only that has been confirmed by Hughton, and it is the only one that the press has got wind of, so let’s not now treat everything that comes from the press as gospel. We know the drill now, nothing is right until it is confirmed blah blah, which I prefer in all honesty, especially if the best the gossip press can come up with is Andy O’Brien!
I just hope Hughton doesn’t read them and get any ideas!
toonsy quick on the draw,your fingers must be doon to the nubs,getting that article typed that fast.