Do Newcastle United really need a Director of Football?
Posted on April 25th, 2010 | 196 Comments |
Owner, Mike Ashley, is apparently looking to appoint someone who has experience in negotiating the financial aspect of transfers and player contracts whilst holding extensive contacts throughout the game to aid in the role at board room level. Now this could be a dangerous tactic, as we have had our fingers burnt with a certain Dennis Wise in his role as Director of Football, and we all know how that turned out! One would hope that Mike Ashley, who has appeared to be learning from the mistakes of the past, will continue learning and recruit someone who is good for the job and will help Chris Hughton, not undermine him. We really need to get things right next season, and making sure the board and manager are singing from the same hymn sheet will be vitally important in avoiding any repeat of last the turmoil of last season.
The theory behind a Director of Football is great. It should allow the manager to crack on with the nitty gritty of the first team squad and training and not have to worry about anything else. The manager should be able to hand a list of players that he would like to strenghten the team with to the Director of Football and let him crack with sorting out the financial side of things. Unfortunately it is a model that doesn’t seem to work in the English game so much, for differing reasons.
But do we really need it? It’s always struck me that Chris Hughton seems to work well with Mike Ashley and Derek Llambias, so why change it? He even got some January signings out of Mike Ashley, much to the surprise of many fans. It’s those signings I want to focus on, and more particularly the way those signings were conducted.
There wasn’t the usual fanfare surrounding incoming players. Wayne Routledge appeared out of nowhere, Mike Williamson arrived with nothing but a few brief, re-hashed stories from the summer and Leon Best only managed to atrract some attention at the last minute. The most notable theme between them all being the fact that they were signed out of the blue. They had been kept unusually quiet, a feat that earned many plaudits from many fans and gave a feeling that, for once, the club looked like it was being run properly.
So why the change of heart if it is indeed true? The club have already demonstrated that they can deal with transfers properly, and Chris Hughton has shown he can identify his own players whilst working within a budget. It just doesn’t add up and doesn’t seem necessary in my opinion.
Mike Ashley should be mindful of the fact that if he does go ahead and appoints a ‘DoF’ that the saga of last season will be brought back up again. Anyone other than a top name like David Dein will immediately arouse the suspicion of many fans who fear it could end up like last season again and play on the still fractious relationship between fan and boardroom.
On the other hand, if it does help the club and they do get the appointment right, then I am all for it. As long as the mistakes of the past have been learnt from of course.
Let’s just wait and see eh?
Answer = No :)
Do we need a new chairman/MD instead of DL?
Answer = Yessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss! :)