Local produce?
Posted on June 7th, 2009 | 15 Comments |
So recent rumours inform us that the front-runner to take over the reigns at Newcastle is a local consortium. Which brings us to an interesting question – is that what all Newcastle fans desire? Do we believe that the only people who could understand us sufficiently to be in a position to manage us effectively, would need to be ‘one of us’?
If you listen to the media, experts and opposing fans (even the odd NUFC fan) then it would seem that it’s exactly what we need. The premise being, however, not that they agree we are a unique club and a special brand of supporter but rather that we are somewhat insular, over-expectant and delusional (the word has lost all meaning it’s used that much). These tendencies thus leading to our downfall in times of trouble, when we become distrustful of the ‘outsiders’ in charge at our club. At which point we drive them out with pitchforks and banners. Apparently, we love our local ‘messiahs’ and collectively we are our own worst enemy. Of course the myth is so much easier to pedal when you ignore the fact that the main protagonist in the argument, Keegan, was born in Doncaster. Minor details though.
Rightly or wrongly, I would agree our fans are quite expectant. A good proportion of our fans are from a generation of ‘close but no cigar’. They liked it and they want that back. Is that something to be chastised for? The reason people got excited about Keegan’s return was that he was the reason for that generation’s expectations. No matter how long he had been out of the game and how out of touch he could be, his very name resonates the most exhilirating period of football seen at St James in recent years. So why wouldn’t we get exicted? Of course with hindsight, KK’s third coming was one of the worst things to happen to the club, feelings mixed on who was ultimately to blame.
I can’t speak for anyone else obviously but my priority with a new owner is to have someone who knows what they’re doing.
If they happen to be ‘local’ then that’s a bonus but it’s not something I’d consider unless all other things are equal (and they never are).
I must admit I was quite keen to have Shearer as manager – or at least as some part of the rebuilding process – while Ashley was there. That was because I didn’t trust Ashley but I trusted Shearer to represent the best interests of the club (and us), which I felt was important after relegation.
Now that Ashley’s leaving, it’s not so important (assuming we get a decent owner). I do actually think Shearer has it in him to do a good job, so I’m certainly not concerned about him being manager, but I won’t be upset if another decent manager is appointed instead.